A designer has submitted a complaint to a Russian site as her
Intellectual Property has been used illegally. This is the response she
has received, so basically the hosting site doesn't respect copyright
& is telling the designer to sort it out with the person who is
violating their copyright. Great for international cooperation and
trying to avoid prejudice.
"Your appeal has been considered. We inform you of the following. Our company does not consider the dispute as a judicial
organ of the parties of copyright infringement and counterfeit goods.
Being a Russian company in its activity, we only obey Russian law. On
the territory of Russia do not apply the laws of the United States (also
DMCA), the EU and other countries. In addition, all the vows in written
or verbal form even «under penalty of perjury» not be regarded as an
adequate proof. Please note that all your accusations based on certain
assumptions and without direct evidence under Russian law is a criminal
offense. Your complaint will be handed over to the client for
consideration"
when did correcting an illegal activity become optional?
ReplyDelete